IGDA elections for the Board of Directors are going on right now. You have until February 28th (this Sunday) to vote for 5 new Board members. 5 members are also leaving, including Tom Buscaglia, who came under some fire during the Tim Langdell shenanigans.
For those of you who are unfamiliar with the International Game Developers Association, it’s a non-profit “professional society for video and computer game developers worldwide” (Wikipedia). It is made of a central organization and many local chapters. Members pay $48 a year for access to IGDA events, products, and services.
People seem to have very differing opinions on the local chapters, which is not surprising, since their quality depends so much on local leaders and members. On the other hand, I’d say people’s opinion of the central org is overall pretty negative. Last year the IGDA was criticized heavily for having Tim “EDGE” Langdell on its Board of Directors and moving very slowly to remove him (he eventually resigned before they could remove him). This was not very long after the IGDA fumbled the Mike Capps situation. Mike, the President of Epic Games, was an IGDA board member when he infamously explained how Epic management expected their employees to work 60+ hours a week on games.
Beyond that, there’s the question of how much the IGDA actually does for game developers, and why they can be so defensive and evasive when one of their own is criticized. With that in mind, this election is important for the IGDA. The idea that another Langdell or Capps is lurking amidst the 23 candidates is a scary thought for members.
Scott Macmillan, an indie developer and a member of the Boston IGDA, realized this and started a section on his website to scrutinize the candidates further. He asked them each a few more specific questions based on their candidate profiles. This is a nice place to start if you’re an IGDA member and are interested in voting.
I’m not an IGDA member, but after reading through Scott’s site, I’d like to share my favorites:
Darius Kazemi – I’ve met Darius at PAX and he’s an active member of TIGForums. He also made a neat mod for Spelunky that updates Twitter. So yeah, I think he’s a cool guy! But another reason I favor him for the IGDA board is because he runs a successful local chapter (Boston) and wants to focus on improving local chapters as a Director. I think this is a great idea, because I get a real sense that the IGDA’s strengths lie with the local chapters and not the bureaucratic central organization. That Darius is an enthusiastic and level-headed indie is great, too. (Greg Costikyan supports Darius in his Mike Capps article, by the way.)
Jane Pinckard – I don’t know Jane personally, but I’m familiar with a lot of her work, which includes writing for GameGirlAdvance, 1up, and various magazines. Good stuff. She wants to make the IGDA a more flexible and diverse place, and that sounds great. It’s notable that she intends to spend 10-15 hours a week on the IGDA, whereas the average amount of time for most candidates is 15 hours a month.
In short, Darius and Jane are young, energetic, creative, and indie-friendly folks so that’s why I like them. I think the IGDA could use more of that.
I’m fairly ambivalent about the other candidates, although I would not hesitate to say DO NOT VOTE FOR DINO DINI! During the Langdell fiasco Dino proved to be extremely irritating and counter-productive on the IGDA forums. He also stood solidly with the status quo (Langdell, Buscaglia, et al) and defended the forum’s shitty censors right up until the point where they censored one of his posts! I wish the IGDA forums hadn’t been wiped out after the incident, because it was something to see. At some point I did say “Be thankful that [Dustin Clingman and Dino Dini] are moderators of a forum and not in charge of something more important”. Hopefully I can continue saying that in March.